https://redmine.named-data.net/https://redmine.named-data.net/favicon.ico?14759811232014-08-10T21:38:46ZNDN project issue tracking systemndn-cxx - Feature #1840: Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-complianthttps://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1840?journal_id=42822014-08-10T21:38:46ZJunxiao Shi
<ul></ul><p>A correct implementation should test the following URIs as equivalent:</p>
<pre><code>/A/B/C
ndn:/A/B/C
ndn:///A/B/C
ndn://authority/A/B/C
/A/./B/C
/A/D/../B/C
/../A/B/C
/./A/B/C
</code></pre> ndn-cxx - Feature #1840: Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-complianthttps://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1840?journal_id=53312014-10-13T19:47:43ZJunxiao Shi
<ul><li><strong>Tracker</strong> changed from <i>Task</i> to <i>Feature</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>v0.3</i> to <i>Unsupported</i></li></ul><p><a href="http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/2014-August/000313.html">http://www.lists.cs.ucla.edu/pipermail/nfd-dev/2014-August/000313.html</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>My opinion is that this feature should be implemented only when somebody actually needs it. Until then, there is no point of spending time on it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Therefore I'm setting Target Version to Unsupported.</p>
ndn-cxx - Feature #1840: Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-complianthttps://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1840?journal_id=53592014-10-15T11:08:02ZJunxiao Shi
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-2 priority-default closed" href="/issues/1818">Bug #1818</a>: Shouldn't [new Name("/a/b/../c").toUri() == "/a/c"]?</i> added</li></ul> ndn-cxx - Feature #1840: Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-complianthttps://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1840?journal_id=94422015-04-03T13:09:47ZJunxiao Shi
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-2 priority-default closed" href="/issues/2725">Bug #2725</a>: Potential name construction errors</i> added</li></ul> ndn-cxx - Feature #1840: Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-complianthttps://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1840?journal_id=209892017-10-28T22:48:37ZDavide Pesavento
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>Make URI resolution RFC3986 compliant</i> to <i>Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-compliant</i></li><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/20989/diff?detail_id=18535">diff</a>)</li></ul> ndn-cxx - Feature #1840: Make ndn URI resolution RFC3986-complianthttps://redmine.named-data.net/issues/1840?journal_id=273342021-06-11T15:52:06ZDavide Pesavento
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Normal</i> to <i>Low</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>Unsupported</i></del>)</li></ul>