Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #4813

closed

Face.putNack

Added by Junxiao Shi almost 6 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Nack packet enables a producer application to tell the network that certain content is temporarily unavailable.
Face class should have a putNack method that allows transmitting a Nack packet.

Actions #1

Updated by Anonymous almost 6 years ago

I thought that ndn-cxx has putNack so that NFD can send a network Nack to say that a route prefix is unavailable. You are talking about allowing the application to use a network and routing level message as an application Nack to say some particular file is not available.

Actions #2

Updated by Anonymous almost 6 years ago

... If the application wants to tell NFD that it can't respond to Interests for a prefix, then it should unregister that prefix. Then, NFD will send the Nack.

Actions #3

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 6 years ago

If the application wants to tell NFD that it can't respond to Interests for a prefix, then it should unregister that prefix. Then, NFD will send the Nack.

Unregistering is not always an option. Consider a producer that serves everything under /A except /A/B. It cannot unregister /A because it serves this prefix, but it needs to reply a Nack to any Interest under /A/B, signalling the network to quickly try an alternative path.

Actions #4

Updated by Anonymous almost 6 years ago

Does NFD really work like that? Suppose the network has a route to NFD for /A, and the application registers to receive interests for /A. Then a consumer somewhere sends an interest for /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v1 . It arrives at the producer which sends a network Nack. Will every NFD in the network update its FIB to continue sending interest for /A, but not for /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v1 ?

Actions #5

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 6 years ago

Receiving a Nack from producer tells NFD forwarding strategy that the content isn't available. The strategy implementation may try alternative paths and stop sending more Interests.

Actions #6

Updated by Anonymous almost 6 years ago

Suppose the producer can answer an interest for older content like /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v0, but not for newer content like /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v1 . So if it gets an interest for /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v1 it sends a network Nack. You say the forwarding strategy will maintain detailed information of the different routing for /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v0 and /A/B/junxiao/videos/cats.mp4/v1 (and possibly hundreds of other differences in which content the producer does or doesn't have). Is that actually implemented?

Actions #7

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 6 years ago

best-route and self-learning strategies have some implementation of fine-grained forwarding information. These information are stored in NFD’s measurements table. There are thousands of entries, but unused entries will expire after a few minutes.

Actions #8

Updated by Anonymous over 5 years ago

Hi Junxiao. You needed this first in NDN-JS, right? I added putNack in branch issue/4813-putNack.
https://github.com/named-data/ndn-js/blob/issue/4813-putNack/js/face.js#L981

Can you try it? For example:

face.putNack(interest, new NetworkNack().setReason(NetworkNack.Reason.NO_ROUTE));
Actions #9

Updated by Anonymous over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
Actions #10

Updated by Anonymous over 5 years ago

  • Assignee set to Anonymous
Actions #11

Updated by Anonymous over 5 years ago

In NDN-JS, changes for Face.putNack() are merged to master. It works in my testing. I will proceed to implement this in the other libraries.

Actions #12

Updated by Anonymous over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed

Changes merged to master in all libraries.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF