Activity

From 05/20/2015 to 06/18/2015

01:41 PM Feature #2565 (In Progress): Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Regarding note #33, here how I did the override for onData in expressInterest to submit it to the thread pool:<br>
h... Anonymous
11:08 AM Task #2860 (In Progress): expressInterest should queue interests while async I/O is connecting: See the the following commit. In expressInterest, save interests in onConnectedCallbacks_ while connecting and send t... Anonymous

03:43 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: I did some tests on my Raspberry Pi using "top" for the client app which sends an interest and waits for the reply. T... Anonymous

03:39 PM Bug #2869: NFD Restart Breaks Face Socket: Hi Andrew. Your option number 2 looks like feature request #2075 for the library to inform the application when the c... Anonymous
03:06 PM Bug #2869 (Closed): NFD Restart Breaks Face Socket: If a Face is connected to a remote NFD using TcpTransport, an NFD restart will break the TCP socket. If the default c... Andrew Brown

03:34 PM Task #2860 (Closed): expressInterest should queue interests while async I/O is connecting: If an application calls expressInterest several times, the library needs to connect on the first call. With blocking ... Anonymous
09:30 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Yes, makes sense; like we talked about on the phone, some CPU usage benchmarks between the AsyncSocketChannel and the... Andrew Brown

12:31 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: I want to keep the base class agnostic about which (if any) thread pool implementation is being used. So I don't want... Anonymous
10:03 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: From slide 6 and slide 27 at http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/presentations/TS-4222.pdf: I read that to mean that... Andrew Brown

11:39 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: - you have the setIsRemoved() on the PIT entries; have you thought of just setting that and not removing the entry im... Anonymous

04:35 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Yes, I believe you are right: if I understand the commit correctly, you use Collections.synchronizedList so any add()... Andrew Brown
12:39 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Hi Andrew. A sanity check: In Python we have a Face subclass to dispatch pretty much every method call to the single ... Anonymous
12:28 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Here's the commit to use synchronizedList for pendingInterestTable, etc. I tried to be careful not to call the callba... Anonymous
12:34 PM Bug #2846 (Closed): selfSign certificate name timestamp should be a version component: Anonymous

03:56 PM Bug #2847 (Closed): Created cert name should use lower-case ksk: Merged changes to master in all libraries. Anonymous
03:40 PM Bug #2847 (Closed): Created cert name should use lower-case ksk: IdentityStorage.getNewKeyName adds a name component starting with "KSK-". But it should be "ksk-" as required by the ... Anonymous
09:28 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Yes, still in progress. Branch issue/2565-async-IO<br>
https://github.com/named-data/jndn/tree/issue/2565-async-IO
Anonymous
09:16 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Sounds good; are you working in a specific branch? Andrew Brown

01:58 PM Bug #2846 (Resolved): selfSign certificate name timestamp should be a version component: Merged changes to master. Anonymous
01:05 PM Bug #2846 (Closed): selfSign certificate name timestamp should be a version component: When IdentityManager.selfSign creates the certificate name from the keyName, it just appends a name component with th... Anonymous
11:13 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Hi Andrew. For starters, I'll switch the data structures like pendingInterestTable_ and interestFilterTable_ to use s... Anonymous

11:05 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Ha, I hear you; the benefits of a single managed event loop are awesome, even if it does make JavaScript single-threa... Andrew Brown
10:30 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: .. or is the idea that code should use both: dispatch to "some thread" in a thread pool where that thread does a bloc... Anonymous
10:28 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: The problem with synchronized is that a call to a synchronized method is effectively a blocking call (until the other... Anonymous
10:14 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: I mean speed like how many more bytes could the async version process if the network channel is always saturated with... Andrew Brown
09:57 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Hi Andrew. Thanks for the mention of [ScheduledExecutorService](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/c... Anonymous
09:55 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: My idea for real-world CPU benchmarks of the event loop is to run on a Raspberry Pi and look at uptime. Hopefully, t... Anonymous

04:20 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Makes sense; I wonder if there is a good way to benchmark the before and after for both speed and CPU time. Andrew Brown
04:09 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Yes, the application will provide the thread pool to the library.
About the need for NIO, the concern is not for s... Anonymous
03:52 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Yeah, I implemented my event loop with https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Executors.html#... Andrew Brown
01:28 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Yes, Java nio seems to have a different approach from Python, JavaScript and Boost. In those the library provides an ... Anonymous
01:11 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: I hadn't seen that one; I guess I thought the point of using NIO for jndn was to avoid the `while(true){ face.process... Andrew Brown
11:38 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents: Hi Andrew. You say "the two NIO classes would be ...." but don't we need to use the async versions such as https://do... Anonymous

Also available in: Atom

jndn