Activity
From 02/27/2025 to 03/28/2025
03/14/2025
-
11:10 PM ndncert Feature #5350 (Closed): Add new email probe response
- As discussed [on gerrit](https://gerrit.named-data.net/c/ndncert/+/7662), this can already be done with the following...
-
07:49 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Adam Thieme wrote in #note-13:
> but this has the "INVALID_PARAMETER" issue with certain characters
> ```json
> "na... -
07:21 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Adam Thieme wrote in #note-12:
> Davide Pesavento wrote in #note-11:
> > Testbed.
>
> Thanks, I'll look into it.... -
06:58 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Davide Pesavento wrote in #note-11:
> Testbed.
Thanks, I'll look into it. -
06:55 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Testbed.
-
06:53 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Davide Pesavento wrote in #note-9:
> Sorry, I cannot reproduce that error with the latest ndncert.
>
> ```
> ***... -
05:51 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Sorry, I cannot reproduce that error with the latest ndncert.
```
***************************************
Step 1... -
04:56 PM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Davide Pesavento wrote in #note-7:
> Adam Thieme wrote in #note-6:
> > Using the ndn::Name() constructor, '/' will ... -
04:05 PM ndncert Bug #5351 (Closed): Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Adam Thieme wrote in #note-6:
> Using the ndn::Name() constructor, '/' will break it into multiple and '=' will thro... -
08:20 AM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Davide Pesavento wrote in #note-5:
> After a closer look, I'm confused.
>
> The code quoted in the description do... -
06:50 AM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- After a closer look, I'm confused.
The code quoted in the description doesn't make sense (it's trying to construct... -
04:29 AM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Davide Pesavento wrote in #note-3:
> Thanks for the bug report. I'm guessing the email-to-name conversion doesn't pr... -
03:46 AM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Thanks for the bug report. I'm guessing the email-to-name conversion doesn't properly escape characters that are cons...
-
04:11 AM ndncert Bug #5353 (New): Possible Undesired Behavior in CA param Name Assignment
- Same setup as #5352 and possibly requires the same solution, an email with '/' results in an extra name component, wh...
-
04:01 AM ndncert Bug #5352 (New): CA crashes on parameter with '='
- With 'email' as a parameter used for name assignment, a '=' character in the client's email input will crash the serv...
03/13/2025
-
10:48 AM ndncert Bug #5351: Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- After changing the new email assignment function to this, the crashes stopped:
```cpp
std::vector <ndn::PartialName>
... -
09:44 AM ndncert Bug #5351 (Closed): Email Probe doesn't cover some valid emails
- Slashes and '=' are allowed in the local/first part of an email address, according to RFC 3696
https://www.rfc-edito... -
08:53 AM ndncert Feature #5350: Add new email probe response
- Adam Thieme wrote:
> The current email probe follows this behavior:
> user@sub.domain.tlv -> /ndn/tlv/domain/sub/us...
03/10/2025
-
08:18 AM ndncert Feature #5350 (Closed): Add new email probe response
- The current email probe follows this behavior:
`user@sub.domain.tlv` -> /ndn/tlv/domain/sub/user
We want this nam...
03/05/2025
-
08:41 PM NLSR Feature #5349 (New): Add prefix weighting to NLSR
- NLSR currently provides no ability to weigh prefixes announced by a node anything other than flatly. While this works...
Also available in: Atom