Activity
From 06/01/2015 to 06/30/2015
06/16/2015
- 01:41 PM Feature #2565 (In Progress): Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Regarding note #33, here how I did the override for onData in expressInterest to submit it to the thread pool:<br>
h... - 11:08 AM Task #2860 (In Progress): expressInterest should queue interests while async I/O is connecting
- See the the following commit. In expressInterest, save interests in onConnectedCallbacks_ while connecting and send t...
06/11/2015
- 03:43 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- I did some tests on my Raspberry Pi using "top" for the client app which sends an interest and waits for the reply. T...
06/09/2015
- 03:39 PM Bug #2869: NFD Restart Breaks Face Socket
- Hi Andrew. Your option number 2 looks like feature request #2075 for the library to inform the application when the c...
- 03:06 PM Bug #2869 (Closed): NFD Restart Breaks Face Socket
- If a Face is connected to a remote NFD using TcpTransport, an NFD restart will break the TCP socket. If the default c...
06/08/2015
- 03:34 PM Task #2860 (Closed): expressInterest should queue interests while async I/O is connecting
- If an application calls expressInterest several times, the library needs to connect on the first call. With blocking ...
- 09:30 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Yes, makes sense; like we talked about on the phone, some CPU usage benchmarks between the AsyncSocketChannel and the...
06/05/2015
- 12:31 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- I want to keep the base class agnostic about which (if any) thread pool implementation is being used. So I don't want...
- 10:03 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- From slide 6 and slide 27 at http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/presentations/TS-4222.pdf: I read that to mean that...
06/04/2015
- 11:39 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- - you have the setIsRemoved() on the PIT entries; have you thought of just setting that and not removing the entry im...
06/03/2015
- 04:35 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Yes, I believe you are right: if I understand the commit correctly, you use Collections.synchronizedList so any add()...
- 12:39 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Hi Andrew. A sanity check: In Python we have a Face subclass to dispatch pretty much every method call to the single ...
- 12:28 PM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Here's the commit to use synchronizedList for pendingInterestTable, etc. I tried to be careful not to call the callba...
- 12:34 PM Bug #2846 (Closed): selfSign certificate name timestamp should be a version component
06/02/2015
- 03:56 PM Bug #2847 (Closed): Created cert name should use lower-case ksk
- Merged changes to master in all libraries.
- 03:40 PM Bug #2847 (Closed): Created cert name should use lower-case ksk
- IdentityStorage.getNewKeyName adds a name component starting with "KSK-". But it should be "ksk-" as required by the ...
- 09:28 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Yes, still in progress. Branch issue/2565-async-IO<br>
https://github.com/named-data/jndn/tree/issue/2565-async-IO
- 09:16 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Sounds good; are you working in a specific branch?
06/01/2015
- 01:58 PM Bug #2846 (Resolved): selfSign certificate name timestamp should be a version component
- Merged changes to master.
- 01:05 PM Bug #2846 (Closed): selfSign certificate name timestamp should be a version component
- When IdentityManager.selfSign creates the certificate name from the keyName, it just appends a name component with th...
- 11:13 AM Feature #2565: Implement async operations for Face.processEvents
- Hi Andrew. For starters, I'll switch the data structures like pendingInterestTable_ and interestFilterTable_ to use s...
Also available in: Atom