Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #2575

open

Unspecified fields should not be present in packets

Added by Alex Afanasyev almost 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
High
Assignee:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Current implementation, does not follow the semantics of NDN packet format, where by default interests request any data. Only when MustBeFresh is explicitly specified, this interest can be matched against fresh data.


Related issues 1 (1 open0 closed)

Copied to NDN-CCL - Bug #2628: Default value for Interest.Selectors.MustBeFresh should be falseNew03/09/2015

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Jeff Burke almost 10 years ago

This requires deprecating AnswerOriginKind support in NDN-CCL (or at least jNDN) and phasing out the NDNx packet format support. This is a good approach for us to consider with jNDN but needs some discussion. I've already proposed a process to handle this but received no reply. Please reply to my email of 10/10/14 (reforwarded 10/26/14 and 1/12/15) to kick this off...

Actions #2

Updated by Jeff Burke almost 10 years ago

  • Project changed from jndn to NDN-CCL
Actions #3

Updated by Alex Afanasyev almost 10 years ago

This issue is NOT CCL and has limited relation to "deprecating" of other packet support: why if I didn't specify MustBeFresh selector it suddenly appears in my Interest packet?

Actions #4

Updated by Jeff Burke almost 10 years ago

So, if the field is unspecified, it should not show up in the Interest at all? (This is fine, but is this part of the ndn-tlv specification?)

Actions #5

Updated by Jeff Burke almost 10 years ago

  • Copied to Bug #2628: Default value for Interest.Selectors.MustBeFresh should be false added
Actions #6

Updated by Jeff Burke almost 10 years ago

  • Subject changed from Default value for Interest.Selectors.MustBeFresh should be false to Unspecified fields should not be present in packets
Actions #7

Updated by Jeff Burke almost 10 years ago

  • Assignee set to Alex Afanasyev
Actions #8

Updated by Alex Afanasyev almost 10 years ago

Why is it assigned to me?

The only logical way is to not include something into packets if it wasn't specified by the application (e.g., we don't put scope if it wasn't present, we don't add lifetime if it wasn't changed, we don't add selectors if nothing was selected). What else needs to be specified?

Actions #9

Updated by Alex Afanasyev almost 10 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (Alex Afanasyev)
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF