Project

General

Profile

Actions

Task #4486

open

NDN Performance evaluation for scientific data - request for comments

Added by susmit shannigrahi about 6 years ago. Updated about 6 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Start date:
02/02/2018
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:


Files

susmit_ndn_seminar.pdf (442 KB) susmit_ndn_seminar.pdf Anonymous, 02/02/2018 03:04 PM
Actions #1

Updated by susmit shannigrahi about 6 years ago

Comments from the seminar:

  1. Look at CPU utilization
  2. Change ndncatchunks/putchunks timeout from 200 ms.
  3. How much delay is due to queueing at NFD vs queueing at catchunks?
  4. Make sure CS is at capacity - performance should be even lower
  5. Multi-hop performance should be compared to multihop tcp.
Actions #2

Updated by Anonymous about 6 years ago

susmit shannigrahi wrote:

Comments from the seminar:

  1. Look at CPU utilization
  2. Change ndncatchunks/putchunks timeout from 200 ms.
  3. How much delay is due to queueing at NFD vs queueing at catchunks?

I think the queuing is rather at putchunks (where data packets are) than catchunks.

  1. Make sure CS is at capacity - performance should be even lower
  2. Multi-hop performance should be compared to multihop tcp.

Also look at Multihop UDP. + Figure out how to use larger packets over UDP (using NDNLP fragmentation).

For slide 10 "Performance over TCP tunnels":

  • Can you retry with congestion reaction disabled?

Specifically for slide 11 "Performance over UDP tunnel":

  • What is the packet loss?
  • What are the measured RTTs? (min/avg/max)
  • What is the performance of 1 UDP tunnel vs. 2 UDP tunnels?
  • How many congestion marks do you get?
  • Compare results with and without congestion marking.
Actions #3

Updated by Anonymous about 6 years ago

Attached file as pdf.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF