Actions
Task #4486
openNDN Performance evaluation for scientific data - request for comments
Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Start date:
02/02/2018
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Description
Link to slides from previous seminar:
https://susm.it/talk/performance-evaluation-of-named-data-networking-forwarding-daemon/
Files
Updated by susmit shannigrahi almost 7 years ago
Comments from the seminar:
- Look at CPU utilization
- Change ndncatchunks/putchunks timeout from 200 ms.
- How much delay is due to queueing at NFD vs queueing at catchunks?
- Make sure CS is at capacity - performance should be even lower
- Multi-hop performance should be compared to multihop tcp.
Updated by Anonymous almost 7 years ago
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Comments from the seminar:
- Look at CPU utilization
- Change ndncatchunks/putchunks timeout from 200 ms.
- How much delay is due to queueing at NFD vs queueing at catchunks?
I think the queuing is rather at putchunks (where data packets are) than catchunks.
- Make sure CS is at capacity - performance should be even lower
- Multi-hop performance should be compared to multihop tcp.
Also look at Multihop UDP. + Figure out how to use larger packets over UDP (using NDNLP fragmentation).
For slide 10 "Performance over TCP tunnels":
- Can you retry with congestion reaction disabled?
Specifically for slide 11 "Performance over UDP tunnel":
- What is the packet loss?
- What are the measured RTTs? (min/avg/max)
- What is the performance of 1 UDP tunnel vs. 2 UDP tunnels?
- How many congestion marks do you get?
- Compare results with and without congestion marking.
Updated by Anonymous almost 7 years ago
- File susmit_ndn_seminar.pdf susmit_ndn_seminar.pdf added
Attached file as pdf.
Actions