Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #2553

closed

Block::fromBuffer use move semantics

Added by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Base
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
1.50 h

Description

Change signature of Block::fromBuffer from

static bool Block::fromBuffer(..., Block&);

to

static std::tuple<bool, Block> Block::fromBuffer(...);

Old syntax becomes deprecated after this API change.


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Blocks ndn-cxx - Task #2636: Delete deprecated Block::fromBuffer overloadsClosedJunxiao Shi

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Blocks Feature #2261: Don't use exceptions in PartialMessageStore::receiveNdnlpData added
Actions #2

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Junxiao Shi
Actions #3

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 50
  • Estimated time changed from 1.00 h to 1.50 h

http://gerrit.named-data.net/1797

Upcoming commits (of this issue):

  • check and fix owned projects
  • put DEPRECATED macro

Future version (as separate issue):

  • delete deprecated overloads
Actions #4

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Blocks deleted (Feature #2261: Don't use exceptions in PartialMessageStore::receiveNdnlpData)
Actions #5

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 50 to 100

ndn-cxx put on DEPRECATED macro http://gerrit.named-data.net/1822

NFD fix http://gerrit.named-data.net/1823

repo-ng fix http://gerrit.named-data.net/1824

Notice is sent to ndn-lib nfd-dev with deadline Mar 08 12:00 UTC.

Actions #6

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Code review

Deadline has passed. The Change should be merged now without further waiting, to prevent other projects introduce new usages of deprecated overloads.

Actions #7

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

<!--

In reply to @Alex's review comment:

I see no rush in merging this.

The Change is uploaded in full compliance with project policy.
There's no reason for ANY delay.
It is a rush to merge this Change, and any other completed Change that complies with project policy.

I prefer this commit to be merged much later, closer to the release of 0.4.

The deprecation notice sent to ndn-lib and nfd-dev is a promise that this Change will merge on a date shortly after the deadline.
There's no reason for ANY further delay.

At least not until we synchronize/path ndnSIM 2.0.

  • ndn-cxx-breaks has proven that this Change does not break ndnSIM https://travis-ci.org/yoursunny/ndn-cxx-breaks/builds/53906392.
  • If there's a hidden issue, it should have been raised BEFORE the deadline as a reply-all to the deprecation notice.
  • If there's a hidden issue, the relevant Bug should be created in ndnSIM and that Bug should block this Feature, and this should have been done BEFORE the deadline.

Therefore, I request to merge this Change now.

Otherwise, my further contribution to ndn-cxx will be throttled until this Change is merged.

-->

(there was rant here; it's now hidden)

Actions #8

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Code review to Closed

Change is merged. Thanks for approving.

Actions #9

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Blocks Task #2636: Delete deprecated Block::fromBuffer overloads added
Actions #10

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to In Progress
  • % Done changed from 100 to 90

I'm sorry but ndn-cxx-breaks didn't detect that NFD is still using a deprecate overload in daemon/face/ndnlp-partial-message-store.cpp.

I'll upload the fix in one hour, and refine ndn-cxx-breaks to avoid the same problem.

Actions #11

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Code review
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100

NFD fix: http://gerrit.named-data.net/1857

ndn-cxx-breaks didn't catch the problem because it builds NFD in release mode so warnings aren't errors.

It now builds NFD in debug mode, and catches the error as expected: https://travis-ci.org/yoursunny/ndn-cxx-breaks/builds/54129155.

Actions #12

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Code review to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF