Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #2899

open

DigestSha256 vs CRC-32C

Added by Alex Afanasyev over 9 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

(Originally reported by Gordon Irlam)

Signature type DigestSha256. Cryptographic robustness isn't necessary for integrity protection, and comes at great cost. A quick test shows that Sha256 only runs at around 250Mbytes/sec on a current generation single core. Thanks in part to a special instruction on the same core, CRC32C runs at around 24Gbytes/sec. The use case for dispensing with provenance protection is likely to be the need for high performance. I would therefore suggest considering adding CRC32C to the spec, and possibly removing DigestSha256.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF