Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #4478

closed

time::fromIsoString doesn't decode large dates

Added by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago. Updated about 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Alex Afanasyev
Category:
Utils
Target version:
v0.7
Start date:
01/25/2018
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:

Description

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(LargeDates)
{
  auto value = fromUnixTimestamp(milliseconds(1390966967032LL));
  BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(toIsoString(value), "20140129T034247.032000");
  BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(fromIsoString("20140129T034247.032000"), value);

  value += days(365 * 100 + 25 - 1); // 36524 days
  BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(toIsoString(value), "21140129T034247.032000");
  BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(fromIsoString("21140129T034247.032000"), value);
}

Expected: all tests passed

Actual:

../tests/unit-tests/util/time.t.cpp(89): error in "LargeDates": check fromIsoString("21140129T034247.032000") == value failed [251673271032000000 nanoseconds since Jan 1, 1970 != 4546640567032000000 nanoseconds since Jan 1, 1970]

Note. The issue seem to have been fixed in Boost 1.66 and later, however all Linux distributions have older versions of Boost that have the issue.

Related issues 2 (0 open — 2 closed)

Related to ndn-cxx - Bug #3915: time::toIsoString and time::toString overflow with large datesClosedJunxiao Shi01/11/2017

Actions
Related to ndn-cxx - Bug #4476: Wrong ValidityPeriod.NotAfter in certificate expiring after year 2038ClosedAlex Afanasyev01/25/2018

Actions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Related to Bug #3915: time::toIsoString and time::toString overflow with large dates added
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Related to Bug #4476: Wrong ValidityPeriod.NotAfter in certificate expiring after year 2038 added
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Davide Pesavento about 6 years ago

  • Category set to Utils

is this what causes #4476 or is it just "related"?

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Alex Afanasyev
  • % Done changed from 0 to 20
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

is this what causes #4476 or is it just "related"?

This is the cause. ValidityPeriod stores dates in ISO 8601 strings.

Note. The issue seem to have been fixed in Boost 1.66 and later, however all Linux distributions have older versions of Boost that have the issue.

The immediate solution is probably another workaround. But we should really stop wasting time on old platforms and ship everything as Docker images.

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Bug #4476: Wrong ValidityPeriod.NotAfter in certificate expiring after year 2038)
Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  • Has duplicate Bug #4476: Wrong ValidityPeriod.NotAfter in certificate expiring after year 2038 added
Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Code review
  • % Done changed from 20 to 100
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Has duplicate deleted (Bug #4476: Wrong ValidityPeriod.NotAfter in certificate expiring after year 2038)
Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

  • Related to Bug #4476: Wrong ValidityPeriod.NotAfter in certificate expiring after year 2038 added
Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Eric Newberry about 6 years ago

Junxiao Shi wrote:

The immediate solution is probably another workaround. But we should really stop wasting time on old platforms and ship everything as Docker images.

I disagree strongly with not supporting NFD running directly on the OS (w/o Docker), but shipping NFD as a Docker image in addition would be a good idea. However, this is not the proper issue to discuss the pros and cons of this approach.

Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Davide Pesavento about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Code review to Closed
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF