Bug #2023
closed
ERROR: Failed to register prefix in local hub's daemon
Added by Ali Khan over 9 years ago.
Updated almost 7 years ago.
Description
The ndn-repo generated an error while it was running on OpenWRT router.
The error messages are written as follows:
root@NDN11:/var/db/ndn-repo-ng# ndn-repo-ng
initialize storage cost: 0 millisecondsms
1412040874.154965 INFO: [FaceTable] Added face id=260 remote=fd://19 local=unix:///var/run/nfd.sock
ERROR: Failed to register prefix in local hub's daemon
Command Interest timed out
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'repo::WriteHandle::Error'
Aborted
root@NDN11:/var/db/ndn-repo-ng# 1412040884.826144 WARNING: [UnixStreamFace] [id:260,uri:fd://19] Send or receive operation failed, closing face: Broken pipe
1412040885.518848 INFO: [FaceTable] Removed face id=260 remote=fd://19 local=unix:///var/run/nfd.sock
Related issues
1 (1 open — 0 closed)
Precisely, I have cross compiled the NFD, ndn-cxx and repo-ng for the OpenWRT router. All are the latest version from github. The NFD was running properly, but error messages were generated while it was running the ndn-repo-ng.
However, the ndn-repo-ng is working properly when it runs on Linux machine.
The error messages (rearrange from previous post) are written as follows:
root@NDN11:/var/db/ndn-repo-ng# ndn-repo-ng
initialize storage cost: 0 millisecondsms
ERROR: Failed to register prefix in local hub's daemon
Command Interest timed out
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'repo::WriteHandle::Error'
Aborted
1412040874.154965 INFO: [FaceTable] Added face id=260 remote=fd://19 local=unix:///var/run/nfd.sock
1412040884.826144 WARNING: [UnixStreamFace] [id:260,uri:fd://19] Send or receive operation failed, closing face: Broken pipe
1412040885.518848 INFO: [FaceTable] Removed face id=260 remote=fd://19 local=unix:///var/run/nfd.sock
- Description updated (diff)
From what I can see, you have started just nfd process, which is not enough.
You need nfd and nrd processes to be started in order for NDN applications to work properly.
I have just checked the running process on this router. The nfd and nrd processes have already run, but I still have the same error messages after running the "ndn-repo-ng" command.
Besides, I also tested with other NDN applications (i.e. ndnping, nun-traffic-geneartor), they were running properly on this mobile router.
If you need more information such as logs or nfd' status, please suggest.
Thank you
- Assignee set to Junxiao Shi
- Estimated time set to 3.00 h
This is probably caused by repo-ng registering four separate routes into NFD-RIB, but ndn::nfd::Controller does not have stop-and-wait (#2293), cause some commands being rejected.
Another possibility is simply insufficient computation power on OpenWRT.
I'll try to address the first cause.
- Tracker changed from Task to Bug
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Blocks Feature #4129: Management Dispatcher for repo commands added
- Status changed from In Progress to Code review
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
https://gerrit.named-data.net/3940
I decide to make a small change to fix the excessive FIB entries problem, which has bothered me in my deployments for some months.
Eventually this needs to be switched over to the dispatcher.
- Status changed from Code review to Closed
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by