Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #2501

closed

test_nfdc_C: nfd-status: Failed to unregister prefix

Added by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Integration Tests
Target version:
Start date:
02/10/2015
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:

Description

Integration test case test_nfdc_C is failing.

Host A test_nfdc/nfdc_test_C.log says:

TEST START
nfd-status: Failed to unregister prefix

Files

20150209.zip (76.8 KB) 20150209.zip test log on Emulab Junxiao Shi, 02/10/2015 09:15 AM
20150302_1828,2.zip (78.7 KB) 20150302_1828,2.zip 1828,2 test log on Emulab Junxiao Shi, 03/02/2015 10:37 AM
Actions #1

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

Actions #2

Updated by Hila Ben Abraham almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #3

Updated by Hila Ben Abraham almost 10 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Same problem as #2502 - Need to wait before the output of nfd-status changes.
Is it on purpose that nfd-status doesn't refresh its output?

Actions #4

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

Is it on purpose that nfd-status doesn't refresh its output?

StatusDatasets from NFD Management are refreshed once every second.

sleep 2 shall do it.

Actions #6

Updated by Hila Ben Abraham almost 10 years ago

The new log introduce 2 new errors:

1. test\_nfdc fails for scenario A & B.
2. test\_interest_aggregation fails.

I couldn't reproduce 1, but it seems to be the same problem of getting out-of-date output from nfd-status.
Regarding the second error, the produced test log is unreadable so I need some more time to figure out the exact problem.

Actions #7

Updated by Hila Ben Abraham almost 10 years ago

An update:

I think that test_interest_aggregation fails because ndn-tlv-peek fails to send interests:

$ndn-tlv-peek ndn:/test-agg/ 

1425531594.411624 INFO: [UnixStreamFace]
[id=-1,local=unix:///run/nfd.sock,remote=fd://31] Creating face
1425531594.412065 INFO: [FaceTable] Added face id=277 remote=fd://31     local=unix:///run/nfd.sock
test-agADtmnfd_integration_testKEksk-142551004468ID-CERT?;F???x?,?߹?-?????????? P??C!l??O??U?=MR-0u6??????`8????Q?o7sL?
                                                                                                                    d.q?2?OU?Iү???????_?g&S?/,:    &l?D???u?p?&??A?????}2???k?p??  9j???z
?A??T???u??
       ??{???#?C??@?CD?r?go?IE????)???])???????7?u??
2E???`c\??}????)????߈|#-?K?'??d?hilata@b:/tmp/integration-tests$     1425531594.433362 INFO: [FaceTable] Removed face id=277 remote=fd://31     local=unix:///run/nfd.sock (Connection closed)

I need to continue with some more debugging, but before doing that I thought to ask whether anyone is familiar with this problem.

Actions #8

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

The mojibake in the output seems to be the Data packet, which means ndn-tlv-peek indeed sends the Interest.

#1384 has the spec for Interest aggregation scenario. Please find out which step is failing, so that I can give more specific suggestion.

Actions #9

Updated by Hila Ben Abraham almost 10 years ago

I think that I found the problem. the test fails when running 2 instances of ndn-peek with the same name. The expected number of received interests is 1, but ndn-traffic-server reports on 2 incoming interests. I couldn't reproduce it manually, but it happens on every run of test_interest_aggregation.

A solution:
The script currently runs both instances of ndn-tlv-peek together. I was able to solve the error by running the first instance of ndn-tlv-peek, and then waiting for it to be completed before running the second instance. Therefore, it looks like nfd doesn't aggregate interests when arrive to close to each other. It's hard for me to point on the exact interval that causes the problem, but I wonder if that's related to the refresh period of the statusDatasets.

Actions #10

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

Thanks for the analysis in note-9. This problem is separated to #2621.

Please upload the patch for #2501 and #2502. I would treat Interest aggregation as an expected failure for now, so that the Change will be approved as long as there's no other failure.

Actions #11

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF