Feature #4577
closedNaming conventions: use typed name components instead of markers
100%
Description
Naming Conventions revision 1 encodes segment number, version number, timestamp, and sequence number as a GenericNameComponent where the TLV-VALUE has a one-byte marker followed by a NonNegativeInteger.
NDN Packet Format v0.3 introduces typed name components. They are intended to replace markers.
This issue is to reserve four NameComponent TLV-TYPE numbers for segment number, version number, timestamp, and sequence number, and publish a new revision of naming conventions document that use typed name components instead of markers. Implementation of such scheme will be separate issues.
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    - Blocks Feature #4706: RDR packet format specification added
 
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    - Status changed from New to In Progress
 - Assignee set to Junxiao Shi
 - % Done changed from 0 to 20
 
I'm assigning type 33-37 for naming convention usage in NameComponentType rev10.
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    The next step is to update Name Convention technical report. Where is the source code for NDN-TR-0022?
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    - Blocks deleted (Feature #4706: RDR packet format specification)
 
      
      Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 7 years ago
      
    
    It was in ndn-memos repository. Created a new repo for it with old text in https://gitlab.com/named-data/tr-ndn-0022-naming-conventions
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    https://gitlab.com/named-data/tr-ndn-0022-naming-conventions
That is inaccessible.
I found https://github.com/named-data/memo-naming-conventions and it seems to be the same. Shall I send PR to this GitHub repository?
      
      Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 7 years ago
      
    
    No. You should have access after you accept the invitation from gitlab.
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    - Why isn’t the GitLab repository public, like the others?
 - GitHub repository should have a link to its GitLab replacement.
 
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 7 years ago
      
    
    - Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
 - % Done changed from 20 to 70
 
Merge request opened on GitLab.com https://gitlab.com/named-data/tr-ndn-0022-naming-conventions/merge_requests/1
      
      Updated by Davide Pesavento about 7 years ago
      
    
    Junxiao Shi wrote:
https://gitlab.com/named-data/tr-ndn-0022-naming-conventions/merge_requests/1
This link returns a 404
      
      Updated by Anonymous about 7 years ago
      
    
    I repeat Junxiao's question. Why are we using a private GitLab repo?
      
      Updated by Davide Pesavento almost 7 years ago
      
    
    - Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
 
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 7 years ago
      
    
    The GitLab repository has been made public. Please review my merge request.
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 7 years ago
      
    
    - Blocks Feature #4777: Develop API for typed name components in naming convention added
 
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi over 6 years ago
      
    
    - Status changed from Feedback to Closed
 - % Done changed from 70 to 100
 
TR commit has been merged.
      
      Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago
      
    
    Published as revision 2: https://named-data.net/publications/techreports/ndn-tr-22-2-ndn-memo-naming-conventions/
Thanks Davide for copyediting.
      
      Updated by Davide Pesavento almost 6 years ago
      
    
    - Related to Task #5044: Switch default naming convention encoding to TYPED added