Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Feature #4577

closed

Naming conventions: use typed name components instead of markers

Added by Junxiao Shi over 6 years ago. Updated about 5 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Junxiao Shi
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
3.00 h

Description

Naming Conventions revision 1 encodes segment number, version number, timestamp, and sequence number as a GenericNameComponent where the TLV-VALUE has a one-byte marker followed by a NonNegativeInteger.
NDN Packet Format v0.3 introduces typed name components. They are intended to replace markers.
This issue is to reserve four NameComponent TLV-TYPE numbers for segment number, version number, timestamp, and sequence number, and publish a new revision of naming conventions document that use typed name components instead of markers. Implementation of such scheme will be separate issues.

Related issues 2 (0 open — 2 closed)

Related to ndn-cxx - Task #5044: Switch default naming convention encoding to TYPEDClosedEric Newberry

Actions
Blocks ndn-cxx - Feature #4777: Develop API for typed name components in naming conventionClosedJunxiao Shi

Actions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Assignee set to Junxiao Shi
  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

I'm assigning type 33-37 for naming convention usage in NameComponentType rev10.

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

The next step is to update Name Convention technical report. Where is the source code for NDN-TR-0022?

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  • Blocks deleted (Feature #4706: RDR packet format specification)
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

It was in ndn-memos repository. Created a new repo for it with old text in https://gitlab.com/named-data/tr-ndn-0022-naming-conventions

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

https://gitlab.com/named-data/tr-ndn-0022-naming-conventions

That is inaccessible.

I found https://github.com/named-data/memo-naming-conventions and it seems to be the same. Shall I send PR to this GitHub repository?

Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Alex Afanasyev about 6 years ago

No. You should have access after you accept the invitation from gitlab.

Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  1. Why isn’t the GitLab repository public, like the others?
  2. GitHub repository should have a link to its GitLab replacement.
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 20 to 70
Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Anonymous about 6 years ago

I repeat Junxiao's question. Why are we using a private GitLab repo?

Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Davide Pesavento almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 6 years ago

The GitLab repository has been made public. Please review my merge request.

Actions
Copy link
 #15

Updated by Junxiao Shi almost 6 years ago

  • Blocks Feature #4777: Develop API for typed name components in naming convention added
Actions
Copy link
 #16

Updated by Junxiao Shi over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed
  • % Done changed from 70 to 100

TR commit has been merged.

Actions
Copy link
 #17

Updated by Junxiao Shi about 5 years ago

Actions
Copy link
 #18

Updated by Davide Pesavento about 5 years ago

  • Related to Task #5044: Switch default naming convention encoding to TYPED added
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF